As I've Said, the Federal Government Should Follow the Same Strategy...

...When they get back in power.

First.

Before all of the other things they've been salivating to do.

Relocate those offices of agencies/departments to inland places, and make relocation MANDATORY.

Give NO hint that this is punitive. Insist, both publicly and privately, that this is:

1. To reduce expenses administratively, thereby saving money in the agency's budget.
2. To reduce traffic congestion, thereby saving our environment.
3. To bring needed services to the hinterland, moving their administration closer to their clients.
4. To jump-start economies in depressed areas.

Now, to make sure that this all happens quickly, use RENTED/LEASED facilities in the new locations. This will give a BIG boost to the economy, and make the change happen quicker. Resist ALL efforts to slow down the process, answering "Don't you understand just how VITAL your agency is? Do you want to further ruin the environment? Do you not understand how important it is to be closer to the stakeholders?" to any objectors.

Point out the disparate impact on the average citizen, having to travel to distant places to talk to an administrator. Remind them that MANY private companies are re-locating to lower cost of living states.

Of course, PRIVATELY (don't even breathe a word to the spousal unit), you realize that many of the minions will not move to the new location, which will cut out the middle management faction that is so loyal to the Dems/Left. The lowest level of the staff may, in fact, move. Most of them are not truly on board with the Woke shit. Triage the staff:

• Should move - they have demonstrated an actual work ethic (not just B$ yearly evaluations, based on their alignment with Woke). Offer them some incentive to move, perhaps some assistance with finding jobs for the spouse (the cities/counties/states may come up with some extra money, for those who are identified as "essential").
• CAN move - you have not identified them as actively hostile to the new administration, and they seem to be doing an adequate job. If they're willing to handle the hassle, OK. Perhaps offer them a tax break - if they sell their house, they can avoid the tax penalty on any profits for not immediately replacing it with another. You don't want them to dig in roots in the new place; they should rent for a while, to see if they like it.
• Will not be offered the opportunity to move - their job will be eliminated through "administrative re-organization". Bribe them with some cash to accept without a fight.

Trump was truly the man needed for 2016. He shook things up, and returned a lot of the EOs to null and void.

In 2024, we need a PRACTICED administrator, who has a clear vision of just how to dismantle the government's apparatus, and the ability to identify those who will help him do that. 

Trump's weakest characteristic was his hiring. Now, he was handicapped by cautious people not eager to put themselves in the crosshairs of the Left, turning him down.

However, he was also hampered by deliberate sabotage from career "intelligence" moles who fed him misinformation, "vetted" disguised comrades, and made every attempt to hide their evil works.