He/she is a HUMAN BEING - made in the image of God. They are not perfect; some may use sharp language in arguing their beliefs. They may delight in the foibles of their political opponents - laugh at their pratfalls, enjoy the scandals, and gloat over their defeat.
That doesn't excuse you from doing the same.
We're SUPPOSED to follow the Christian example - turn the other cheek, return abuse with a gentle smile, act decently, even when reviled.
Yeah. That's NOT easy. For me, I have to work - HARD - to avoid using intemperate language when insulted. My natural inclination is to give it back - with some extra spin on the ball. Particularly aiming at the face.
Sometimes, you might argue, it's not possible to respond without some venom. That opponent, you say, has EARNED the biting retort through their nasty speech.
Really?
Let's examine one such case, and consider the FULL story.
Forbes Magazine had a recent look at Sarah Palin's bringing up the Ukraine in the 2008 debates. The first line reads: Sarah Palin may not have been able to see Russia from her house, but she might have been right about Russia invading Ukraine.
BTW, Palin NEVER said she could see Russia from her house - that was Tina Fey. She DID say, correctly, that from some parts of Alaska, you could see the shores of Russia.
“After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama’s reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia’s Putin to invade Ukraine next,” Palin claimed in 2008, during her vice-presidential bid alongside John McCain.
Are the Liberal media falling over themselves to apologize for mocking her earlier words?
Don't be ridiculous!
Has Sarah gone a little over-the-top in crowing about her prediction coming true?
Well, yeah, she has rubbed it in.
Can you blame her?
No comments:
Post a Comment