One day an Arab and his camel were crossing the desert. Night came and the temperature became colder. The Arab put up his tent and tied the camel to it. The Arab went to sleep.
The temperature became slightly colder and the camel asked the Arab if he (camel) could just put his nose in the tent to warm up. The Arab agreed that the camel could just put his nose in, because the tent was small and there was no room for 2. So the camel's nose became warm and after a while the temperature went down even more.
The camel asked the Arab again, if he (camel) could just put his fore legs in because they were very cold. The Arab reluctantly agreed that the camel could only put his fore legs in and no more. So the camel moved in his fore legs and they became warm. After sometime the camel asked the Arab again that he had to put in his hind legs or else he won't be able to make the journey the next morning with frozen legs. So the Arab agreed and once the camel moved his hind legs in, there was no more room in the tent for the Arab and the Arab was kicked out.
The concept of conventional wisdom is always defeated by an entity determined to get its way, first asking for a "harmless" concession of a tired opponent, then, incrementally, continuing to push to achieve its long-term goal. Just keep that in mind next time you're asked to make ONE TINY compromise.
In other news:
P. J. O'Rourke has gone out of his mind.
He is foaming at the mouth about Ted Cruz. Yes, TED - Blanking - CRUZ. According to P. J., having Cruz as the Republican candidate would be THE Ultimate Worst Thing (I assume that he is patenting the phrase).
Because Ted is not fervently in favor of SSM (Same Sex Marriage) and legalized marijuana.
That's it? One of the most qualified Republicans - one that ACTUALLY held the line when the Dems tried to push their agenda on the Senate - and the problem he has with Ted is that he thinks we ought to not upset a socially-recognized marriage tradition that has lasted for all of recorded history. Oh, and, that, absent GOOD - not anecdotal - scientific evidence that pot is worth legalizing, we shouldn't change its status.
Now, many disagree about the SSM thing. I do understand that. From my perspective, I'd rather the government get the Blank out of the marriage endorsement altogether, and just institute Civil Unions. Those who WANT to get married, can - assuming that they can find a minister, Internet-ordained person, Cultic Leader, or other person that can persuade a religious/spiritual/frankly-nutty-offbeat-organization to handle the ceremony.
No - absolutely NO - pressure on churches/temples/mosques to marry people against their principles.
Got few problems with that.
Oh, and, if someone has a preferred title - Mr., Mrs., Miss, Ms., Supreme Leader, whatever - let's accept that addressing them by that title is optional, not mandatory. Most people will go along. Some will have objections.
Let's just decide that "Citizen" is the acceptable alternative for those with philosophical objections. As in, Citizen Cruz. Citizen Clinton (either). And, Citizen O'Rourke.
And, the pot thing?
Listen, I've taught for many years. Before that, I often encountered people under the influence of Wacky Weed. Including one of my roommates, and her friends.
I can assure you, with absolute confidence, NOT ONE of those so impaired was in any way smarter, more rational, or having razor-sharp reflexes.
In fact, there was little to distinguish them from someone born Lazy, Mentally Slow-Processing, and, to be honest, Dumb as Dirt.
NOT what I want to see as the norm for American Citizens. Nor, for that matter, those under the age of 18.
Oh, but, legalization will only affect those OVER 18.
Of course, the fact that buying or using pot by a minor will be against the law will TOTALLY stop them from doing it.
Just like the fact that it's illegal now stops them.